{"id":420,"date":"2007-06-14T17:21:31","date_gmt":"2007-06-14T07:21:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.msnaughty.com\/blog\/2007\/06\/14\/jezebel-and-figleaf-on-porn-for-women\/"},"modified":"2007-06-14T17:21:31","modified_gmt":"2007-06-14T07:21:31","slug":"jezebel-and-figleaf-on-porn-for-women","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/2007\/06\/14\/jezebel-and-figleaf-on-porn-for-women\/","title":{"rendered":"Jezebel And Figleaf On Porn For Women"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"FigleafDamn, it’s getting hard to keep up. Today’s ranty article about the Porn for Women<\/a>* book is at Jezebel<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In this case the author has sent an email to all her friends asking about what porn they like. There’s a bunch of varied responses, most of which are quite cynical, but I had to laugh at this one:<\/p>\n

I always thought girl porn like Sweet Action<\/em> was really icky. Like, I’m pretty irked by the assumption that I want to look “real people.” I may date guys that look like that, but it’s not because they look hot naked. Also I don’t want to look at fat or pale chicks. Also I might see them Urban Outfitters later and feel gross. I like my porn people tanned buff and hairless with their anuses bleached, like everyone else.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ah, bleached anuses. Who knew?<\/p>\n

The comments there and those at Ask Sam<\/a> just seem to reinforce that women really do have a huge variety of tastes. On top of that, there’s a distinct feeling of frustration and irritation with the majority of porn. Marketing experts might call it a form of “resistance.” I get the feeling that plenty of women are looking, but they’re not finding what they want. <\/p>\n

For The Girls is one option, but it’s never going to cater to everybody. The market is growing, but slowly.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the article links to Figleaf’s HNT post<\/a> where he attempts to look sexy while doing housework. The pics are great. Can a plunger ever be sexy? Figleaf makes it look possible. Check out his other sexy pics here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Figleaf has also made some nice comments here<\/a> about the idea of women having a sense of agency while viewing porn.<\/p>\n

* I don’t know why I keep linking to this damn book (aside from the affiliate kickbacks). I’ll never get to fucking #1 on Google at this rate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Damn, it’s getting hard to keep up. Today’s ranty article about the Porn for Women* book is at Jezebel. In this case the author has sent an email to all her friends asking about what porn they like. There’s a bunch of varied responses, most of which are quite cynical, but I had to laugh at this one: I always thought girl porn like Sweet Action was really icky. Like, Read More …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,14,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-feminism","category-porn","category-pornforwomen"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t