{"id":1824,"date":"2010-03-22T20:15:05","date_gmt":"2010-03-22T10:15:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.msnaughty.com\/blog\/?p=1824"},"modified":"2010-03-22T20:15:05","modified_gmt":"2010-03-22T10:15:05","slug":"too-much-genital-detail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/2010\/03\/22\/too-much-genital-detail\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Too Much Genital Detail&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><code><object width=\"500\" height=\"314\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" data=\"http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/tv\/cinerama2\/cineramaEmbed.swf?version=2.0\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/tv\/cinerama2\/cineramaEmbed.swf?version=2.0\"><\/param><param name=\"allowfullscreen\" value=\"true\"><\/param><param name=\"allowscriptaccess\" value=\"always\"><\/param><param name=\"flashvars\" value=\"src=rtmp:\/\/cp44823.edgefcs.net\/ondemand\/flash\/tv\/streams\/hungrybeast\/hungrybeast_0114_labiaplasty_hi.flv&amp;width=500&amp;height=300&amp;imageURL=http:\/\/hungrybeast.abc.net.au\/sites\/default\/files\/imagecache\/story\/images\/story\/LABIAPLASTY.JPG&amp;title=LABIAPLASTY&amp;pageURL=http:\/\/hungrybeast.abc.net.au\/stories\/labiaplasty\"><\/param><\/object><\/code><\/p>\n<p>A couple of weeks ago Hungry Beast on the ABC did a great job of exposing the insanity of Australia&#8217;s classification laws, focusing on the rule that forbids &#8220;too much genital detail&#8221; in photos of naked women in magazines. Essentially, the rule means that any glimpse of a woman&#8217;s inner labia is considered to be obscene and thus the mag has to be classified as &#8220;restricted&#8221; and be wrapped in plastic in some places.<\/p>\n<p>This rule has been in force for over ten years. The end result is that soft porn magazines like <em>People<\/em> and <em>Penthouse<\/em> regularly adjust photos of women&#8217;s genitalia with Photoshop, &#8220;healing&#8221; any stray pink bits to ensure the pussy looks &#8220;neat and tidy&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Never mind that women&#8217;s pussies are rarely &#8220;neat and tidy&#8221; or that uneven or protruding inner labia are perfectly normal, our government ensures that the average person can&#8217;t see them in a unrestricted magazine. The result, of course, is that anyone looking at these pictures may develop a warped view of how women&#8217;s vulvas are supposed to look.<\/p>\n<p>This issue last surfaced in 2001 when <em>Australian Women&#8217;s Forum<\/em> featured an article on labiaplasty and discussed the effects of airbrushed porn on women&#8217;s self esteem. It sought to include &#8220;before&#8221; and &#8220;after&#8221; photos revealing how the Photoshopping occurs&#8230; but then the Classification Board stepped in and ruled that the article contained &#8220;too much genital detail.&#8221; Even though the photos were absolutely relevant to the story.<\/p>\n<p>I watched this and snarled, especially at the clueless representative of the Board who hedged and said had no real idea as to what met the guidelines and what didn&#8217;t. Of course, he was lying. He knows that pink bits are bad. That&#8217;s the way it&#8217;s been done for the last ten years. The publishing industry knows it and have adjusted their practices accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m hoping that this report helped to raise awareness among younger people about the nonsense that is our censorship system. Maybe this combined with the R-rated games issue and net filtering will get people finally thinking about why the government thinks adults are unable to deal with inner labia, or violent video games, or fetishes.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of weeks ago Hungry Beast on the ABC did a great job of exposing the insanity of Australia&#8217;s classification laws, focusing on the rule that forbids &#8220;too much genital detail&#8221; in photos of naked women in magazines. Essentially, the rule means that any glimpse of a woman&#8217;s inner labia is considered to be obscene and thus the mag has to be classified as &#8220;restricted&#8221; and be wrapped in <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/2010\/03\/22\/too-much-genital-detail\/\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[910,187,455,456,494,839],"class_list":["post-1824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship","tag-censorship","tag-classification","tag-labia","tag-labiaplasty","tag-magazines","tag-vulva"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1824"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1824\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/msnaughty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}